<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Year in Review: 2007 Stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanseodesign.com/analytics/2007-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/analytics/2007-stats/</link>
	<description>Helping you build search engine friendly websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:03:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/analytics/2007-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/the-year-in-review-2007-stats/#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>Forums can be a great source of traffic if you approach them right. It&#039;s amazing how many people try to spam them instead of participating honestly. I get most of my forum traffic from forums where I&#039;m a member, but I do get some traffic where other people have added a link back here.

I had a feeling stumblers would like your site. I know I&#039;ve stumbled a few of your images and will again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forums can be a great source of traffic if you approach them right. It&#8217;s amazing how many people try to spam them instead of participating honestly. I get most of my forum traffic from forums where I&#8217;m a member, but I do get some traffic where other people have added a link back here.</p>
<p>I had a feeling stumblers would like your site. I know I&#8217;ve stumbled a few of your images and will again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/analytics/2007-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/the-year-in-review-2007-stats/#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>Ironically ... I seem to get around four times as much traffic from forums I haven&#039;t been to compared to ones I frequent.  Figure that one out...  Somali Life has sent a small but fairly steady stream for several months.  I can&#039;t even find from where, but the access patterns look pretty natural.  Lately I got 40 or so users from a Nikon camera forum - I use Canon, and the two have a rivalry like Windows and Mac.  Anyway, most forums seem to use &lt;i&gt;post.php?id=71&lt;/i&gt; style URLs, so I can&#039;t see what people are saying about me...

And your&#039;e right - Stumble sends a good deal of traffic my way.  Digg and a few others, too, but on a much smaller level.  I think a lot of them are more technical in nature, where Stumblers are more like channel surfers of the web, and good photos work pretty well in that context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically &#8230; I seem to get around four times as much traffic from forums I haven&#8217;t been to compared to ones I frequent.  Figure that one out&#8230;  Somali Life has sent a small but fairly steady stream for several months.  I can&#8217;t even find from where, but the access patterns look pretty natural.  Lately I got 40 or so users from a Nikon camera forum &#8211; I use Canon, and the two have a rivalry like Windows and Mac.  Anyway, most forums seem to use <i>post.php?id=71</i> style URLs, so I can&#8217;t see what people are saying about me&#8230;</p>
<p>And your&#8217;e right &#8211; Stumble sends a good deal of traffic my way.  Digg and a few others, too, but on a much smaller level.  I think a lot of them are more technical in nature, where Stumblers are more like channel surfers of the web, and good photos work pretty well in that context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/analytics/2007-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 05:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/the-year-in-review-2007-stats/#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>I think impressive is a relative word. The numbers are good compared to last year, but at the same time they&#039;re not where I&#039;d like them to be. Of course I always compare things to others doing better to help drive me. Overall I was happy with the traffic numbers.

I expected December to fall off some given we have what amounts to a week of holidays. Last year, though December was my best month. Maybe it&#039;s last year that&#039;s really the anomaly.

October and November were very good social media traffic months. Most of the social media numbers above are from those two months. That&#039;s where the increase in traffic came from and that&#039;s also the reason for the December slump.

I have some goals in mind for the coming year, but I&#039;m holding off for a resolution post I&#039;ll write next week.

Would I be right if I assumed StumbleUpon drives a lot of traffic your way? How about Webmaster-Talk or other forums?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think impressive is a relative word. The numbers are good compared to last year, but at the same time they&#8217;re not where I&#8217;d like them to be. Of course I always compare things to others doing better to help drive me. Overall I was happy with the traffic numbers.</p>
<p>I expected December to fall off some given we have what amounts to a week of holidays. Last year, though December was my best month. Maybe it&#8217;s last year that&#8217;s really the anomaly.</p>
<p>October and November were very good social media traffic months. Most of the social media numbers above are from those two months. That&#8217;s where the increase in traffic came from and that&#8217;s also the reason for the December slump.</p>
<p>I have some goals in mind for the coming year, but I&#8217;m holding off for a resolution post I&#8217;ll write next week.</p>
<p>Would I be right if I assumed StumbleUpon drives a lot of traffic your way? How about Webmaster-Talk or other forums?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/analytics/2007-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 04:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/the-year-in-review-2007-stats/#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>Those are some pretty impressive numbers!  Especially compared to 2006.

December traffic has dipped off a bit on my end, too.  I&#039;m assuming it&#039;s the holidays;  more time with the family, less in front of the computer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are some pretty impressive numbers!  Especially compared to 2006.</p>
<p>December traffic has dipped off a bit on my end, too.  I&#8217;m assuming it&#8217;s the holidays;  more time with the family, less in front of the computer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

