<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blogger&#8217;s Code Of Conduct: A Pointless Pursuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/bloggers-code-of-conduct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/bloggers-code-of-conduct/</link>
	<description>Helping you build search engine friendly websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:29:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/bloggers-code-of-conduct/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/the-bloggers-code-of-conduct-a-pointless-pursuit/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>You know I&#039;ve hardly seen anyone in support of Tim&#039;s code of conduct. Some people commenting on his blog is about it. I&#039;m sure some people like the idea, but they seem to be few and far between. I wonder how long he&#039;s going to carry the idea. I&#039;m sure he&#039;s getting plenty of links out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I&#8217;ve hardly seen anyone in support of Tim&#8217;s code of conduct. Some people commenting on his blog is about it. I&#8217;m sure some people like the idea, but they seem to be few and far between. I wonder how long he&#8217;s going to carry the idea. I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s getting plenty of links out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/bloggers-code-of-conduct/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/the-bloggers-code-of-conduct-a-pointless-pursuit/#comment-600</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see blogger going against Tim absurd proposition. I think if he could reconsider he would never have published his code of conduct, It&#039;s going down like a lead balloon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see blogger going against Tim absurd proposition. I think if he could reconsider he would never have published his code of conduct, It&#8217;s going down like a lead balloon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/bloggers-code-of-conduct/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 03:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/the-bloggers-code-of-conduct-a-pointless-pursuit/#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Forrest I&#039;m not sure it matter since none of us will be hearing what Imus has to say now that he&#039;s unemployed. I&#039;m a very strong believer in free speech. I think it forms the backbone of a free society and part of free speech means allowing people to say things even when those things offend you.

In Kathy Sierra&#039;s case it wasn&#039;t a free speech issue, but more one that would fall under threats of violence.

A few of my favorite authors couldn&#039;t be read for many years because their works were considered offensive when it was first published. Much art pushes the envelope on what would be considered inoffensive. And can you even say anything abut religion or politics without offending someone?

Dustin (nice to see you by the way. been awhile) I&#039;m against censorship in all forms. Like I just said I think freedom of speech is the backbone of a free society. There&#039;s a reason why freedom of speech is the very first amendment and not the second or the tenth.

I moderate a couple of forums and no matter how many times you check in there&#039;s always some spam threads. I&#039;m sure some get forever missed. There&#039;s simply no way you can police every comment that comes across your blog to know if they&#039;re legit or if they&#039;ve been published elsewhere or if they might possibly offend someone. And there&#039;s no reason you should have to.

I&#039;m a couple of weeks away from finishing spring softball here. We started the first week of March and fortunately the weather held up ok. Last year we played in 60 mph winds. It was impossible to hit the plate with a pitch. Next up is summer and then fall. I&#039;ll be playing till late October/early November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forrest I&#8217;m not sure it matter since none of us will be hearing what Imus has to say now that he&#8217;s unemployed. I&#8217;m a very strong believer in free speech. I think it forms the backbone of a free society and part of free speech means allowing people to say things even when those things offend you.</p>
<p>In Kathy Sierra&#8217;s case it wasn&#8217;t a free speech issue, but more one that would fall under threats of violence.</p>
<p>A few of my favorite authors couldn&#8217;t be read for many years because their works were considered offensive when it was first published. Much art pushes the envelope on what would be considered inoffensive. And can you even say anything abut religion or politics without offending someone?</p>
<p>Dustin (nice to see you by the way. been awhile) I&#8217;m against censorship in all forms. Like I just said I think freedom of speech is the backbone of a free society. There&#8217;s a reason why freedom of speech is the very first amendment and not the second or the tenth.</p>
<p>I moderate a couple of forums and no matter how many times you check in there&#8217;s always some spam threads. I&#8217;m sure some get forever missed. There&#8217;s simply no way you can police every comment that comes across your blog to know if they&#8217;re legit or if they&#8217;ve been published elsewhere or if they might possibly offend someone. And there&#8217;s no reason you should have to.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a couple of weeks away from finishing spring softball here. We started the first week of March and fortunately the weather held up ok. Last year we played in 60 mph winds. It was impossible to hit the plate with a pitch. Next up is summer and then fall. I&#8217;ll be playing till late October/early November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/bloggers-code-of-conduct/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/the-bloggers-code-of-conduct-a-pointless-pursuit/#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Hey Steve!

Great post, and I agree! While I&#039;m typically very conservative, the internet is one place where I absolutely HATE censorship. (although that&#039;s not really the main bullet of this post...). But when people start telling me what I can and cannot blog about I get very frustrated. Who are they to try to control what I blog about? How is blogging different than talk? (other than the fact that its written...).

I agree, I would take responsibility for my own words, of course. But in one of my forums the SPAM was so incredibly bad for a while it was almost impossible to stay on top of. And we&#039;re talking graphic graphic porn. While we did our best until we could find a tool.... It&#039;s just another one of those things that are semi-out-of-our control.


D

PS: another softball season is upon us ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve!</p>
<p>Great post, and I agree! While I&#8217;m typically very conservative, the internet is one place where I absolutely HATE censorship. (although that&#8217;s not really the main bullet of this post&#8230;). But when people start telling me what I can and cannot blog about I get very frustrated. Who are they to try to control what I blog about? How is blogging different than talk? (other than the fact that its written&#8230;).</p>
<p>I agree, I would take responsibility for my own words, of course. But in one of my forums the SPAM was so incredibly bad for a while it was almost impossible to stay on top of. And we&#8217;re talking graphic graphic porn. While we did our best until we could find a tool&#8230;. It&#8217;s just another one of those things that are semi-out-of-our control.</p>
<p>D</p>
<p>PS: another softball season is upon us <img src='http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/bloggers-code-of-conduct/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/the-bloggers-code-of-conduct-a-pointless-pursuit/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>I wonder what Don Imus has to say about this?

A year ago they passed a law making it a crime to write offensive material online.  This may have been a Washington State law, I don&#039;t remember, and haven&#039;t heard anything about it since.  This sort of thing is unenforceable ... partly for the reason you pointed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what Don Imus has to say about this?</p>
<p>A year ago they passed a law making it a crime to write offensive material online.  This may have been a Washington State law, I don&#8217;t remember, and haven&#8217;t heard anything about it since.  This sort of thing is unenforceable &#8230; partly for the reason you pointed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

