<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is There An Optimal Post Length For Blogs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/is-there-an-optimal-post-length-for-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/is-there-an-optimal-post-length-for-blogs/</link>
	<description>Helping you build search engine friendly websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:07:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: See the proof that people like to read online</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/is-there-an-optimal-post-length-for-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>See the proof that people like to read online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/is-there-an-optimal-post-length-for-blogs/#comment-512</guid>
		<description>[...] I am not sure whether writing shorter posts is more preferrable, really. In my opinion, how useful the article/post is matters most. Then formatting plays a large role, because I have frequently observed myself ignoring posts with very long paragraphs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am not sure whether writing shorter posts is more preferrable, really. In my opinion, how useful the article/post is matters most. Then formatting plays a large role, because I have frequently observed myself ignoring posts with very long paragraphs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/is-there-an-optimal-post-length-for-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/is-there-an-optimal-post-length-for-blogs/#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Thanks John. I have a short attention span too, but it bothers me to read the fluff posts that just point to something else. It&#039;d fine sometimes and I know I&#039;ve done it myself here and there, but some blogs seem to never have anything to say. I feel the same way as you that those blogs are just a waste of time and my subscription generally doesn&#039;t last long.

I think the healthy mix is probably best. I know I tend to write longer posts and I sometimes wonder if I have too many long posts, but like I said I just write and when I get to the end I know I&#039;m finished.

I also think regardless of long or short if the quality is good enough people will read. I do know some blogs where the posts are often very short, but the blogger packs a lot of information into a few words. I&#039;ve also see blogs heavy on post length that say little or nothing. I hope I&#039;m not one of the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks John. I have a short attention span too, but it bothers me to read the fluff posts that just point to something else. It&#8217;d fine sometimes and I know I&#8217;ve done it myself here and there, but some blogs seem to never have anything to say. I feel the same way as you that those blogs are just a waste of time and my subscription generally doesn&#8217;t last long.</p>
<p>I think the healthy mix is probably best. I know I tend to write longer posts and I sometimes wonder if I have too many long posts, but like I said I just write and when I get to the end I know I&#8217;m finished.</p>
<p>I also think regardless of long or short if the quality is good enough people will read. I do know some blogs where the posts are often very short, but the blogger packs a lot of information into a few words. I&#8217;ve also see blogs heavy on post length that say little or nothing. I hope I&#8217;m not one of the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/blogging/is-there-an-optimal-post-length-for-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>John Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/is-there-an-optimal-post-length-for-blogs/#comment-510</guid>
		<description>I like the conclusion that a post is done when it&#039;s done, when it&#039;s managed to convey what it needs to.  I hate short little blurbs that describe something without actually going into the important details more than I hate long posts, and I have to admit I have a short attention span.

Probably a mix of long and short posts is best, and it&#039;s also what your conclusion is likely to get you.  Have a look at Fake Steve Jobs blog - some of the posts are nothing but a link ( rare ), some are a paragraph, and some would be a printed page.  Most seem to be about three paragraphs, but there&#039;s a good mix, something for everybody.  Occasionally I&#039;ll skip a longer post, and mean to go back and read it, even if I don&#039;t wind up doing so.

Even still, I can&#039;t stress enough how much I hate &quot;fluff.&quot;  If I read a paragraph that doesn&#039;t actually say anything, it&#039;s slightly upsetting.  I just wasted 60 seconds of my valuable time reading somebody&#039;s baseless opinions.  Long posts might not catch my attention, or I might drift off halfway through and not finish, but these don&#039;t *offend* me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the conclusion that a post is done when it&#8217;s done, when it&#8217;s managed to convey what it needs to.  I hate short little blurbs that describe something without actually going into the important details more than I hate long posts, and I have to admit I have a short attention span.</p>
<p>Probably a mix of long and short posts is best, and it&#8217;s also what your conclusion is likely to get you.  Have a look at Fake Steve Jobs blog &#8211; some of the posts are nothing but a link ( rare ), some are a paragraph, and some would be a printed page.  Most seem to be about three paragraphs, but there&#8217;s a good mix, something for everybody.  Occasionally I&#8217;ll skip a longer post, and mean to go back and read it, even if I don&#8217;t wind up doing so.</p>
<p>Even still, I can&#8217;t stress enough how much I hate &#8220;fluff.&#8221;  If I read a paragraph that doesn&#8217;t actually say anything, it&#8217;s slightly upsetting.  I just wasted 60 seconds of my valuable time reading somebody&#8217;s baseless opinions.  Long posts might not catch my attention, or I might drift off halfway through and not finish, but these don&#8217;t *offend* me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
