<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Update On Paid Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/an-update-on-paid-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/an-update-on-paid-links/</link>
	<description>Helping you build search engine friendly websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:29:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/an-update-on-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 03:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/an-update-on-paid-links/#comment-729</guid>
		<description>The problem from Google&#039;s point of view is that paid links aren&#039;t really a &#039;vote&#039; for another site and that voting system is still at the heart of their algorithm. If they want to discount links they discover as paid that&#039;s within their right. It&#039;s their search engine after all.

What I find wrong is if the other links on a page become guilty by association. There are valid reasons to sell links. It&#039;s called advertising and Google should understand that given their business model is based nearly 100% on advertising.

They shouldn&#039;t assume that one or a handful of paid links means all links are paid and they shouldn&#039;t punish every link on a site because of a few that are paid. At first I though they would only stop the paid links from flowing PR, but I&#039;m beginning to think they may prevent an entire site from passing PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem from Google&#8217;s point of view is that paid links aren&#8217;t really a &#8216;vote&#8217; for another site and that voting system is still at the heart of their algorithm. If they want to discount links they discover as paid that&#8217;s within their right. It&#8217;s their search engine after all.</p>
<p>What I find wrong is if the other links on a page become guilty by association. There are valid reasons to sell links. It&#8217;s called advertising and Google should understand that given their business model is based nearly 100% on advertising.</p>
<p>They shouldn&#8217;t assume that one or a handful of paid links means all links are paid and they shouldn&#8217;t punish every link on a site because of a few that are paid. At first I though they would only stop the paid links from flowing PR, but I&#8217;m beginning to think they may prevent an entire site from passing PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/an-update-on-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 04:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/an-update-on-paid-links/#comment-728</guid>
		<description>It sounds like they&#039;ve decided a site that sells links is a bad neighborhood.  I think stopping any outflow of PR from that site is to hurt it (by making its links less desirable, worth no money) and not the sites it links to.

Also, I wonder how many people who sell links also give them away for free?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like they&#8217;ve decided a site that sells links is a bad neighborhood.  I think stopping any outflow of PR from that site is to hurt it (by making its links less desirable, worth no money) and not the sites it links to.</p>
<p>Also, I wonder how many people who sell links also give them away for free?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

