<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Takes Steps To Protect Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/google-takes-steps-to-protect-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/google-takes-steps-to-protect-privacy/</link>
	<description>Helping you build search engine friendly websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:29:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/google-takes-steps-to-protect-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/google-takes-steps-to-protect-privacy/#comment-535</guid>
		<description>Its a nice step by google, But we can&#039;t truely be anonymouse online unless we take steps ourselves. I think google are doing all they can.

I can understand them wanting to record search terms, Them not doing so would be like McDonalds not tracking how many burgers they have sold or Microsoft not tracking how many computers run windows. But it&#039;s nice that they are removing the ability to track it to a specific person on thier end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a nice step by google, But we can&#8217;t truely be anonymouse online unless we take steps ourselves. I think google are doing all they can.</p>
<p>I can understand them wanting to record search terms, Them not doing so would be like McDonalds not tracking how many burgers they have sold or Microsoft not tracking how many computers run windows. But it&#8217;s nice that they are removing the ability to track it to a specific person on thier end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/google-takes-steps-to-protect-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/google-takes-steps-to-protect-privacy/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>I agree. I don&#039;t expect them to not collect the data. I would in their position so I can&#039;t really blame them. It&#039;s good to see they&#039;re at least anonymizing it after a time and hopefully the others will follow. I now people look at Google first when they think of all the search histories being saved, but if you remember that Google was the only engine not to turn of search histories when the US government requested them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I don&#8217;t expect them to not collect the data. I would in their position so I can&#8217;t really blame them. It&#8217;s good to see they&#8217;re at least anonymizing it after a time and hopefully the others will follow. I now people look at Google first when they think of all the search histories being saved, but if you remember that Google was the only engine not to turn of search histories when the US government requested them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

