<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Personalized Search Dangerous?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/is-personalized-search-dangerous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/is-personalized-search-dangerous/</link>
	<description>Helping you build search engine friendly websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:29:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/is-personalized-search-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/is-personalized-search-dangerous/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>I think the danger is due to Google not making it obvious that your search results are personalized to you and your neighbor may be getting a different set of results. By giving results based on your past Google will be reinforcing whatever thoughts you currently hold.

Here&#039;s an overly dramatic example. Let&#039;s say you belong to a hate group. It doesn&#039;t matter which. Because of your past search history and the sites you&#039;ve clicked on and visited sites that might be able to encourage you not to hate could slowly be filtered out of the results you see in future searches. The sites that continue to promote your hatred are the ones that rise to the top of the SERPs and since those are the only ones you see it reinforces your hate.

It&#039;s an over the top example I know, but I think it&#039;s realistic. People re-evaluate their thoughts and values all the time and it&#039;s good that they do since it&#039;s how we all grow as people. But in order to re-evaluate and grow we need to have new information with viewpoints that differ from our own come in front of us. We can all still go out looking for those alternate viewpoints it&#039;s true. But I think Google has just made it a little harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the danger is due to Google not making it obvious that your search results are personalized to you and your neighbor may be getting a different set of results. By giving results based on your past Google will be reinforcing whatever thoughts you currently hold.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an overly dramatic example. Let&#8217;s say you belong to a hate group. It doesn&#8217;t matter which. Because of your past search history and the sites you&#8217;ve clicked on and visited sites that might be able to encourage you not to hate could slowly be filtered out of the results you see in future searches. The sites that continue to promote your hatred are the ones that rise to the top of the SERPs and since those are the only ones you see it reinforces your hate.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an over the top example I know, but I think it&#8217;s realistic. People re-evaluate their thoughts and values all the time and it&#8217;s good that they do since it&#8217;s how we all grow as people. But in order to re-evaluate and grow we need to have new information with viewpoints that differ from our own come in front of us. We can all still go out looking for those alternate viewpoints it&#8217;s true. But I think Google has just made it a little harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sreejith Ramakrishnan</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/is-personalized-search-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Sreejith Ramakrishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 07:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/is-personalized-search-dangerous/#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Well, I think this may not be as dangerous as you feel. Because they&#039;re not using the Gmail and Adwords data. But what happens when you change opinions ? Thats a really significant concern. I guess we will be served with good results. I think Google might introduce some button to temporarily pause the Search History service.

I think they do have such an option. But I would prefer it to be somewhere near the homepage to make my life easier. I predict more spam these days. Since Social bookmarking and web 2.0 in general have been given more importance, del.icio.us and others should look out. Blackhats may blow their servers.

And, I think Google has a big eye on improving adsense with this new feature. Just think how useful it would be to render ads to people who&#039;re searching for it. It would surely increase CTR. And, google may add a program to adwords where advertisers can target people who search for something like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think this may not be as dangerous as you feel. Because they&#8217;re not using the Gmail and Adwords data. But what happens when you change opinions ? Thats a really significant concern. I guess we will be served with good results. I think Google might introduce some button to temporarily pause the Search History service.</p>
<p>I think they do have such an option. But I would prefer it to be somewhere near the homepage to make my life easier. I predict more spam these days. Since Social bookmarking and web 2.0 in general have been given more importance, del.icio.us and others should look out. Blackhats may blow their servers.</p>
<p>And, I think Google has a big eye on improving adsense with this new feature. Just think how useful it would be to render ads to people who&#8217;re searching for it. It would surely increase CTR. And, google may add a program to adwords where advertisers can target people who search for something like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/is-personalized-search-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 05:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/is-personalized-search-dangerous/#comment-467</guid>
		<description>It would be nice to see it work more like Amazon recommendations where Google might suggest sites the others with the same interests have visited.

In all fairness to Google this won&#039;t just be about them. I assume all the major search engines, will roll out some kind of personalized search at some point. And maybe it will work in ways that doesn&#039;t pigeonhole us. It&#039;s too soon to know really.

One other though occurred to me about this. If you look at Graywolf&#039;s post about Google Video you can see they recommend he look at videos by Matt Cutts and Aaron Wall. Wouldn&#039;t you think he&#039;s already watched them or is at least aware of them and knows how to find them if he does want to watch them.

Using SEO Book as an example I&#039;ve been to the site a lot. I think I&#039;ve read near every one of Aaron&#039;s post for the last year and some of the older ones as well. I really don&#039;t need Google showing me more of those posts when I search. I&#039;ve read them and bookmarked many I want to read again. I also know I can search on the SEO Book site directly.

I&#039;m willing to wait to see how personalized search ends up working, but for now I see more not to like about it than to like about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to see it work more like Amazon recommendations where Google might suggest sites the others with the same interests have visited.</p>
<p>In all fairness to Google this won&#8217;t just be about them. I assume all the major search engines, will roll out some kind of personalized search at some point. And maybe it will work in ways that doesn&#8217;t pigeonhole us. It&#8217;s too soon to know really.</p>
<p>One other though occurred to me about this. If you look at Graywolf&#8217;s post about Google Video you can see they recommend he look at videos by Matt Cutts and Aaron Wall. Wouldn&#8217;t you think he&#8217;s already watched them or is at least aware of them and knows how to find them if he does want to watch them.</p>
<p>Using SEO Book as an example I&#8217;ve been to the site a lot. I think I&#8217;ve read near every one of Aaron&#8217;s post for the last year and some of the older ones as well. I really don&#8217;t need Google showing me more of those posts when I search. I&#8217;ve read them and bookmarked many I want to read again. I also know I can search on the SEO Book site directly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m willing to wait to see how personalized search ends up working, but for now I see more not to like about it than to like about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Linden</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/is-personalized-search-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Linden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 01:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/is-personalized-search-dangerous/#comment-466</guid>
		<description>Only see our own ever shrinking corner of the Web?  Good point, Steven.  If Google merely limits what you see to specific topics or points of view, pigeonholing could be a problem.

Personalization should be designed to reveal the full breadth of the data and enhance serendipity.  The key is to make sure the personalization reaches beyond the obvious and into the surprising.

If Google does that, their personalized search will help people discover new things they would not have found on their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only see our own ever shrinking corner of the Web?  Good point, Steven.  If Google merely limits what you see to specific topics or points of view, pigeonholing could be a problem.</p>
<p>Personalization should be designed to reveal the full breadth of the data and enhance serendipity.  The key is to make sure the personalization reaches beyond the obvious and into the surprising.</p>
<p>If Google does that, their personalized search will help people discover new things they would not have found on their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

