<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Have A Supplemental Index?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/why-have-a-supplemental-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/why-have-a-supplemental-index/</link>
	<description>Helping you build search engine friendly websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:29:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/why-have-a-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/why-have-a-supplemental-index/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>Khalid I think the situation with Joomla happens with most CMS driven sites. WordPress is generally seo friendly, but it still has it&#039;s duplicate content issues. Some of those issues do lead to the supplemental index and knowing that your posts have gone supplemental helps in fixing a few things.

Forrest the supplemental index originated so that Google could still index pages it considered less important. They claim they&#039;re making it much more like the main index, but if there&#039;s no difference it seems silly to maintain two separate indexes.

My guess is Google wants to keep us from reverse engineering things or maybe people were figuring out how to manipulate ranking based on supplemental results. Since supplemental pages don&#039;t pass link juice maybe Google wants to keep hidden which sites it&#039;s figured out are buying and selling links.

It&#039;s also been suggested that people clicked less on links that were labeled supplemental so perhaps this is simply a way to increase CTR.

In the end we&#039;ll still be able to figure out or guess well which pages of a site are supplemental, but it will be harder and it&#039;s another step in Google holding back useful information. If the do add something to Webmaster Central it might not be so bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khalid I think the situation with Joomla happens with most CMS driven sites. WordPress is generally seo friendly, but it still has it&#8217;s duplicate content issues. Some of those issues do lead to the supplemental index and knowing that your posts have gone supplemental helps in fixing a few things.</p>
<p>Forrest the supplemental index originated so that Google could still index pages it considered less important. They claim they&#8217;re making it much more like the main index, but if there&#8217;s no difference it seems silly to maintain two separate indexes.</p>
<p>My guess is Google wants to keep us from reverse engineering things or maybe people were figuring out how to manipulate ranking based on supplemental results. Since supplemental pages don&#8217;t pass link juice maybe Google wants to keep hidden which sites it&#8217;s figured out are buying and selling links.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also been suggested that people clicked less on links that were labeled supplemental so perhaps this is simply a way to increase CTR.</p>
<p>In the end we&#8217;ll still be able to figure out or guess well which pages of a site are supplemental, but it will be harder and it&#8217;s another step in Google holding back useful information. If the do add something to Webmaster Central it might not be so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/why-have-a-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 04:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/why-have-a-supplemental-index/#comment-954</guid>
		<description>I agree it doesn&#039;t really make sense to have a supplemental index, at least from the outside ... but I don&#039;t understand what Google has to gain from making us believe it doesn&#039;t matter which index a age winds up in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree it doesn&#8217;t really make sense to have a supplemental index, at least from the outside &#8230; but I don&#8217;t understand what Google has to gain from making us believe it doesn&#8217;t matter which index a age winds up in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khalid Hajsaleh</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/google/why-have-a-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Khalid Hajsaleh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/why-have-a-supplemental-index/#comment-953</guid>
		<description>Oh, that was interesting. We have so many pages in the supplemental index, it is not funny. We use Joomla for blogging. Joomla was not design with seo in mind. There are so many ways you can navigate to get to the same post with different urls. Of course Google thinks that these entries are duplicates of each other.

I have been thinking more and more of moving our blog back to wp at least that way I can have a little more control over this.

Khalid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, that was interesting. We have so many pages in the supplemental index, it is not funny. We use Joomla for blogging. Joomla was not design with seo in mind. There are so many ways you can navigate to get to the same post with different urls. Of course Google thinks that these entries are duplicates of each other.</p>
<p>I have been thinking more and more of moving our blog back to wp at least that way I can have a little more control over this.</p>
<p>Khalid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

