<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many Links Do You Need?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/</link>
	<description>Helping you build search engine friendly websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:29:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-117629</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 14:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/how-many-links-do-you-need/#comment-117629</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s up to Google. There&#039;s no set schedule for them updating Toolbar PR. It&#039;s also not anything important to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s up to Google. There&#8217;s no set schedule for them updating Toolbar PR. It&#8217;s also not anything important to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-117622</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 14:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/how-many-links-do-you-need/#comment-117622</guid>
		<description>Hi. Great information. How many times on a year change google PR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Great information. How many times on a year change google PR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-95897</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/how-many-links-do-you-need/#comment-95897</guid>
		<description>I think quality more important too. More is generally better than less when it comes to links all other things being equal. But their seldom all equal and in that case quality over quantity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think quality more important too. More is generally better than less when it comes to links all other things being equal. But their seldom all equal and in that case quality over quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novelwebdesigns</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-95760</link>
		<dc:creator>novelwebdesigns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/how-many-links-do-you-need/#comment-95760</guid>
		<description>I think that is not the quantity but the quality of links. A link with pr 7 can be equal to thousands of links with pr 4. A link carries some authority in the eyes of google so quality links matter. Also i want to share with you that scrapebox is the perfect seo tool for harvesting quality links. Is one of the elite tools in my seo armory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is not the quantity but the quality of links. A link with pr 7 can be equal to thousands of links with pr 4. A link carries some authority in the eyes of google so quality links matter. Also i want to share with you that scrapebox is the perfect seo tool for harvesting quality links. Is one of the elite tools in my seo armory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-89208</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/how-many-links-do-you-need/#comment-89208</guid>
		<description>Alexa rank woud have nothing to do with it and PR is a Google only thing. In general yes the quality of the page and site linking to you has an impact on how well your page ranks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexa rank woud have nothing to do with it and PR is a Google only thing. In general yes the quality of the page and site linking to you has an impact on how well your page ranks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandipan@Inkjam</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-86925</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandipan@Inkjam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/how-many-links-do-you-need/#comment-86925</guid>
		<description>Does the quality (PR, Alexa Rank ect) of the site linking back to you affect your rankings??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the quality (PR, Alexa Rank ect) of the site linking back to you affect your rankings??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-68686</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/how-many-links-do-you-need/#comment-68686</guid>
		<description>If you are looking to rank on Google UK, then you will need more quality links from UK sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are looking to rank on Google UK, then you will need more quality links from UK sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/how-many-links-do-you-need/#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>Steven: 

I feel there was a good need to point out the links in order to rank well. There have been many stories written and many writers claimed to be best. But wait...! Being in the Industry since January-2001, I truely never seen a better story than this! The way you have indicated things is magnificient! 

Last night, I have been checking my rankings for  -  -  -  etc, and there has been something I really got wondered. A page appeared from India with no in-links, The website has been prolly new and I checked the Domain WHOis in order to know if I was wrong. But I was right. There have been no back-links created for the website so far, and that Domain was ranking for the SEO Company in all the Data-Centers on the first page. 

I agree..... Linking to the quality website mean ranking well in the google, msn, yahoo and all other search engines, but ranking well with no in-links? Ehh

Will be looking your feedback

All the best and have a good weekend 

Ciao - Tina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven: </p>
<p>I feel there was a good need to point out the links in order to rank well. There have been many stories written and many writers claimed to be best. But wait&#8230;! Being in the Industry since January-2001, I truely never seen a better story than this! The way you have indicated things is magnificient! </p>
<p>Last night, I have been checking my rankings for  &#8211;  &#8211;  &#8211;  etc, and there has been something I really got wondered. A page appeared from India with no in-links, The website has been prolly new and I checked the Domain WHOis in order to know if I was wrong. But I was right. There have been no back-links created for the website so far, and that Domain was ranking for the SEO Company in all the Data-Centers on the first page. </p>
<p>I agree&#8230;.. Linking to the quality website mean ranking well in the google, msn, yahoo and all other search engines, but ranking well with no in-links? Ehh</p>
<p>Will be looking your feedback</p>
<p>All the best and have a good weekend </p>
<p>Ciao &#8211; Tina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: home based travel</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-3223</link>
		<dc:creator>home based travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 02:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/how-many-links-do-you-need/#comment-3223</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the detailed post on links.
So much to know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the detailed post on links.<br />
So much to know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/link-building/how-many-links-do-you-need/comment-page-1/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/how-many-links-do-you-need/#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>@Jim - 300 links is better than none. Are you sure of how many you need? How many links do other sites in your industry have? What is the quality of those links?

@David - Thanks. I agree. It&#039;s going to be easier to rank for things related to what you&#039;re already ranking for and to improve those phrases that are ranking well. I think you can still find much of the info from your own logs, though showing where you rank for the phrase is a nice touch on Google&#039;s part.

@Rudy - Thanks. I think many of us overlook some of the obvious things that can potentially bringing us quality traffic.

One thing to think about with the cheesecake recipe is does that traffic lead to something or are people leaving right after reading the recipe. If it makes sense you might want to create more similar content on the site. Other recipes for example. You&#039;ve found your site can rank for those kind of queries. Now the question becomes what to do with that traffic.

The saying is a good one. I think it goes beyond moving from page 2 to page 1. I think the saying is also implying the idea that if you rank well for cheesecake recipe you might also be able to rank well for chocolate cake recipe and angel food cake recipe. And as your ranking for all those specific recipes you increase your chances of ranking for recipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim &#8211; 300 links is better than none. Are you sure of how many you need? How many links do other sites in your industry have? What is the quality of those links?</p>
<p>@David &#8211; Thanks. I agree. It&#8217;s going to be easier to rank for things related to what you&#8217;re already ranking for and to improve those phrases that are ranking well. I think you can still find much of the info from your own logs, though showing where you rank for the phrase is a nice touch on Google&#8217;s part.</p>
<p>@Rudy &#8211; Thanks. I think many of us overlook some of the obvious things that can potentially bringing us quality traffic.</p>
<p>One thing to think about with the cheesecake recipe is does that traffic lead to something or are people leaving right after reading the recipe. If it makes sense you might want to create more similar content on the site. Other recipes for example. You&#8217;ve found your site can rank for those kind of queries. Now the question becomes what to do with that traffic.</p>
<p>The saying is a good one. I think it goes beyond moving from page 2 to page 1. I think the saying is also implying the idea that if you rank well for cheesecake recipe you might also be able to rank well for chocolate cake recipe and angel food cake recipe. And as your ranking for all those specific recipes you increase your chances of ranking for recipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

