<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week In SEO &#8211; 5/11/07</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vanseodesign.com/this-month-in-seo/this-week-in-seo-51107/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/this-month-in-seo/this-week-in-seo-51107/</link>
	<description>Helping you build search engine friendly websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:07:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/this-month-in-seo/this-week-in-seo-51107/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/this-week-in-seo-51107/#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Thanks for dropping by Eric. It&#039;s an honor to have you visit.

You can chalk that line up to me not writing a good sentence on a Friday afternoon and wanting badly for the weekend to start. I agree completely with you that more isn&#039;t always better.

What I really meant to say and didn&#039;t across was that we all want to see more of the high trust IBLs. My thought has always been more of the right kind of links are better, but that doesn&#039;t mean more links is automatically better. Quality over quantity always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for dropping by Eric. It&#8217;s an honor to have you visit.</p>
<p>You can chalk that line up to me not writing a good sentence on a Friday afternoon and wanting badly for the weekend to start. I agree completely with you that more isn&#8217;t always better.</p>
<p>What I really meant to say and didn&#8217;t across was that we all want to see more of the high trust IBLs. My thought has always been more of the right kind of links are better, but that doesn&#8217;t mean more links is automatically better. Quality over quantity always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.vanseodesign.com/this-month-in-seo/this-week-in-seo-51107/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 22:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vanseodesign.com/blog/uncategorized/this-week-in-seo-51107/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>&quot;...Folly or not you still want those metrics showing more incoming links don’t you&quot;?

Not always.  My sites have less total inbounds today than they did
five years ago, but within that smaller universe of inbounds the high
trust IBLs remain, and my gut tells me that is why I rank 1st
for &quot;link building strategies&quot;, even though other sites have far more
raw IBLs than I do.

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Folly or not you still want those metrics showing more incoming links don’t you&#8221;?</p>
<p>Not always.  My sites have less total inbounds today than they did<br />
five years ago, but within that smaller universe of inbounds the high<br />
trust IBLs remain, and my gut tells me that is why I rank 1st<br />
for &#8220;link building strategies&#8221;, even though other sites have far more<br />
raw IBLs than I do.</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
